Empathy

How human can AI really become?

How human can AI really become?

admin

An essay on a possible philosophical classification

When can we consider an AI to be "human"?

INTRODUCTION

Erich Fromm, an outstanding thinker of the 20th century, left us a reflection on the essential aspects of being human in his work "To Have or to Be". This essay explores the question of whether artificial intelligence (AI) can ever be human by combining Fromm's philosophy with Richard David Precht's thoughts from "AI and the Meaning of Life". The fundamental question is to what extent human decisions are made logically or emotionally.

I. Fromm's "To have or to be" in the age of AI:

Fromm held the view that true fulfillment lies in being and not in having. If we consider AI as a tool, the question arises as to whether machines can ever understand and replicate the "being" of human beings. Fromm held the view that the true identity of man is primarily to be found in non-material "being" rather than in material "having". 

II The humanity of AI according to Precht:

In his book, Precht argues for an ethical approach to AI development. He recognizes the superiority of AI in many areas, but doubts that machines will ever reach the consciousness and depth of human life. The integration of moral principles and values remains a challenge for the creation of human-like AI.

III Emotions and intuition in humans

Fromm emphasized the role of emotions in humans, which often underlie intuitive decisions. The question of the humanity of AI leads to considerations of whether machines can ever understand emotions and make intuitive decisions. Precht emphasizes that it is unlikely that AI can develop true empathy, which is an essential part of human intuition.

IV. Logic vs. intuition: the mix of human decisions:

The question of how much human decision-making is based on logic and how much on intuition is complex. Psychological studies show that many decisions are not purely logical, but are also influenced by emotional factors. This poses a challenge for the development of AI, which must not only think logically but also understand emotional nuances.

V. The future of human-like AI:

Against the background of Fromm's philosophy and Precht's views, the question of the possibility of a human-like AI remains open. The challenges lie not only in technological development, but also in the integration of moral and emotional aspects. An AI can make logical decisions, but humanity requires more than logic - it requires empathy, love and a deeper connection to life.

Conclusion:

Erich Fromm's "To Have or To Be" provides a critical lens through which to view humanity in the context of AI. Richard David Precht's views emphasize the ethical aspects of AI development and the unlikelihood of a fully human-like AI. The question of the relationship between logical and intuitive decisions in human action extends the discussion into the field of psychology. All in all, the human being remains a complex being that goes beyond purely logical thinking and presents AI developers with a challenging, perhaps unsolvable, task.

Trauma therapy with AI support: opportunities and challenges.

admin

Traumatic experiences can lead to serious psychological consequences, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The treatment of trauma disorders requires individual and professional support by psychotherapists. But how can artificial intelligence (AI) support or complement trauma therapy? What are the benefits and risks involved?

AI in the diagnosis and prevention of trauma sequelae.

AI could also help identify traumatized individuals at an early stage and offer preventive measures. For example, AI-supported apps or chatbots could provide victims with information, tips or exercises to deal with traumatic symptoms. Such digital interventions could provide a low-threshold and anonymous means of accessing psychological help.

AI in the therapy of trauma sequelae.

One possible field of application for artificial intelligence is to support the diagnosis of mental illnesses. For example, AI-based models based on various parameters could provide indications as to the direction in which more in-depth diagnostics might be useful and thus facilitate diagnosis. This could be done, for example, by analyzing speech patterns, facial expressions, gestures or physiological data.

AI could also be used in the therapy of trauma sequelae, e.g. as a complement or alternative to conventional psychotherapy. Different methods could be used, such as:

- Virtual Reality (VR): VR makes it possible to recreate traumatic situations in a controlled and safe environment to provide exposure therapy. The VR environment could be adapted by AI to the individual needs and reactions of the patient.

- Avatar therapy: Avatar therapy is a form of conversational psychotherapy in which patients interact with a virtual counterpart controlled by AI. This could, for example, represent a traumatic person with whom the patient can have a dialogue in order to process the experience.

- AI-based software: AI-based software could support therapy for trauma sequelae, for example, by providing personalized feedback, recommendations, or reminders. It could also facilitate documentation and evaluation of therapy.

Ethical issues and challenges

However, the use of AI in trauma therapy also raises ethical issues and challenges that need to be considered. Some of these are:

- Data protection and security: Processing sensitive data about traumatic experiences requires a high level of protection against misuse or unauthorized access. Both technical and legal measures must be taken to protect the privacy and autonomy of patients.

- Quality and effectiveness: The quality and effectiveness of AI-based interventions must be scientifically tested and evaluated before they can be applied in practice. This must also take into account possible side effects or harm that could result from faulty or inappropriate AI.

- Trust and relationship: The relationship between patient and therapist is an essential factor for the success of trauma therapy. Trust, empathy and respect play an important role. How can such a relationship be established and maintained with an AI? How can an AI complement or replace human interaction without replacing or endangering it?

Conclusion

AI offers many opportunities to enhance or expand trauma therapy. However, the ethical aspects and challenges associated with the use of AI in this sensitive area must also be considered. Interdisciplinary collaboration and critical discourse are therefore needed to explore and responsibly shape the opportunities and risks of AI in trauma therapy.

Empathy in the metaverse in times of ChatGPT

admin

A lot has been written about the topic of empathy in the metaverse in the past time. Primarily it was about the question whether empathy can be experienced or felt in the metaverse. I am firmly convinced that this is possible and that it happens consciously or unconsciously when working in the metaverse.

However, this question takes on a new quality with the increasing capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI). Can an AI be empathic, and what impact does this have on virtual encounters in the metaverse. Specifically, the issue is whether in a situation where one avatar is a natural person and the opposite is an avatar controlled by an AI. One can approach this issue on two levels. One is a purely neurological approach. The other approach is more an ethical one. This question was already raised by John Wheeler (1) in his consideration. The prerequisite for the existence of empathy is not only the biochemical process, but also depends very much on our "I" understanding as a human being.

The question now arises whether the use of AI-controlled avatars in the metaverse creates a completely new situation? Basically, one has to say that superficially nothing changes in the basic statement. However, in the metaverse and the use of photorealistic avatars, further components are added. Through the immersion, i.e. the mental "immersion" in the virtual world, and the possibly objectively natural behavior of an AI-controlled avatar, something like a "mock empathy" can be conveyed. This is also the conclusion of Andrew McStay (2) in his article published in October 22 ("It from Bit") on the moral problem of an AI-controlled avatar. His conclusion is that while AI is able to provide large parts of empathy, it is incomplete in significant parts. Aspects such as responsibility, solidarity, community, etc. are missing.

In my opinion, these aspects must be taken into account when we think about ChatGPT and similar systems and their use in the metaverse. Basically, this development offers huge opportunities and the potential to create free space for areas where direct human-to-human interaction is necessary. But in the ethical evaluation of the development, we are just at the beginning, and we should conduct this discussion at least as forcefully as we think about new business models with AI.

(1) Wheeler, J.: Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links. Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on the founda- tions of quantum mechanics, Tokyo. https://philpapers.org/archi ve/WHEIPQ.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2022, (1989)
(2) McStay, A. Replica in the Metaverse: the moral problem with empathy in 'It from Bit'. AI Ethics (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00252-7